The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), under the Income Tax Act, 1961, has reintroduced Safe Harbor thresholds for transfer pricing provisions under Section 92CB. Safe Harbor rules (SHRs) are essential for reducing prolonged transfer pricing disputes, providing taxpayers with certainty regarding the arm’s length price (ALP) for eligible international transactions.
The notification dated [insert date] marks a significant revival and update of thresholds that had either expired or become less relevant in the evolving economic and business environment. This article delves into the background, applicability, thresholds, sectors covered, compliance mechanisms, and strategic benefits for taxpayers.
A Safe Harbor is a legal provision to reduce ambiguity and disputes. In the context of transfer pricing, it refers to circumstances in which the income tax authorities accept declared profits or prices for specified international transactions without detailed scrutiny.
Key Objectives:
Simplify compliance
Reduce litigation
Provide certainty to taxpayers
The Safe Harbor provisions are governed by:
Section 92CB of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Rule 10TD – specifies eligible international transactions and thresholds
Rule 10TE – outlines the procedure for exercising the option
India introduced Safe Harbor Rules in 2013 via Notification No. 46/2013, and they were later modified. The provisions lapsed after the applicability period ended in FY 2019-20. Due to increasing litigation and compliance complexity, the CBDT has now reintroduced updated thresholds keeping in mind the current economic realities.
Applicable from AY 2025-26 onwards
Covers specific international transactions with associated enterprises (AEs)
Applicable only if the taxpayer opts for the same before the due date

| Sl. No | Type of Transaction | Safe Harbor Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | ITES (Low value-added services) | OP/OC >= 17% |
| 2. | Software Development Services | OP/OC >= 18% |
| 3. | KPO Services | OP/OC >= 21% |
| 4. | Contract R&D (IT Sector) | OP/OC >= 24% |
| 5. | Intra-Group Loans (≤ INR 20 Cr) | Interest ≥ SBI base rate + 150 bps |
| 6. | Intra-Group Loans (> INR 20 Cr) | Interest ≥ SBI base rate + 300 bps |
| 7. | Corporate Guarantees | Commission ≥ 1% |
OP: Operating Profit
OC: Operating Cost
bps: Basis points
flowchart TD A[Start] --> B{Is taxpayer eligible?} B -- Yes --> C[Identify eligible international transaction] C --> D[Calculate margin/price] D --> E{Meets Safe Harbor threshold?} E -- Yes --> F[File Form 3CEFA] F --> G[Safe Harbor option exercised] G --> H[Assessment without detailed TP audit] E -- No --> I[Go for regular TP documentation and audit] B -- No --> J[Not eligible for Safe Harbor]
Applicable to back-office support, data entry, customer care, etc.
Minimum Operating Profit Margin: 17% on Operating Cost
No high-end judgment involved
Subject to employee skill set and nature of services
Includes coding, testing, debugging done for AE
Benchmark margin: 18%
Excludes high-end product development
Includes legal processing, analytics, market research
More skill-intensive
Margin required: 21%
R&D services where IP stays with AE
Higher margin reflects higher risk and value contribution
Required margin: 24%
Cap at INR 20 crore for lower threshold
Interest rate must exceed SBI base rate + specified bps
Considered as per currency denomination
Should earn minimum 1% commission for Safe Harbor
Applies to AE guarantees for loans/credit lines
Certainty in transfer pricing assessment
Reduced compliance cost and litigation
No need for complex benchmarking studies
Time-bound assessments
Only applicable if transactions are with non-resident AEs
Safe Harbor margin must be maintained across all such transactions
Margin should be computed as per prescribed rules (Rule 10TA–10TG)
Failure to meet any condition renders Safe Harbor invalid
| Aspect | Safe Harbor | APA |
| Cost | Low | High (filing & negotiation involved) |
| Certainty | Moderate | High |
| Flexibility | Less | More |
| Suitability | Standard transactions | Complex/custom transactions |
Review transaction category, value, and margin
Basic details and proof of cost calculation
Form to be filed on or before the due date of filing ITR
Once accepted, assessment concludes without TP scrutiny
India’s Safe Harbor thresholds are competitive and similar to:
OECD guidelines for low-risk transactions
US Safe Harbor rules for intra-group services
Australia’s ATO simplified TP record keeping rules
Some margins (e.g., 24%) are still considered high
Not suitable for complex or hybrid models
Safe Harbor margins do not consider location savings or scale
CBDT may consider annual revision based on industry data
Clearer definitions of ITES vs KPO to avoid disputes
More categories like distribution services or e-commerce may be included
With renewed interest in India as a service and development hub, these SHRs will encourage:
Better compliance
Improved ease of doing business
Reduced caseload for income tax authorities
Notification Date: [Insert date of notification]
Applicable from: Assessment Year 2025–26
Last Date for Form 3CEFA: Along with ITR due date

The reintroduction of Safe Harbor provisions by CBDT is a forward-looking step to simplify India's international taxation landscape. While it provides tremendous relief to taxpayers dealing with routine international transactions, care must be taken to understand and comply with every condition laid down under the law.
Taxpayers are advised to consult their tax experts or advisors before opting for the Safe Harbor regime to ensure full compliance and strategic alignment with their business model.