
With the growing shift toward India’s new tax regime under Section 115BAC, confusion has emerged among salaried taxpayers regarding the eligibility of HRA (House Rent Allowance) exemption. In light of recent debates and social media speculation, the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) issued a formal clarification, addressing concerns and outlining the applicability of HRA under the new regime.
This article aims to provide a comprehensive explanation of HRA treatment under the new vs old tax regime, insights into the CBDT’s clarification, ITR filing changes, and practical advice for taxpayers.
HRA is a component of salary provided by employers to employees to meet housing expenses. Under the old tax regime, salaried individuals could claim exemption on HRA under Section 10(13A), depending on factors such as:
Rent paid
Location of residence (metro or non-metro)
Basic salary + DA
The least of the following is exempt:
Actual HRA received
50% of salary (for metro cities) or 40% (non-metro)
Rent paid minus 10% of salary
In 2020, the government introduced a concessional tax regime under Section 115BAC, offering lower slab rates in exchange for foregoing most exemptions and deductions. From FY 2023–24 (AY 2024–25), this new regime became the default option for individual taxpayers unless the old regime was specifically opted for.
One of the major deductions that taxpayers lost under the new regime is HRA exemption.
Amid growing taxpayer anxiety, especially due to confusion over retrospective tax claims and IT notices, the CBDT issued an official clarification in April 2024 to dispel misconceptions.
No HRA Exemption Under New Regime
If you opt for the new tax regime, the entire HRA component in your salary is considered fully taxable. This is because Section 10(13A) (HRA exemption) is not allowed under Section 115BAC unless you opt back into the old regime.
No Special Scrutiny Drive
Rumors were circulating that the Income Tax Department had initiated a large-scale review of old HRA claims. The CBDT clarified that there is no special or retrospective drive to scrutinize or reopen old HRA exemption claims. Only specific high-value mismatches identified through data analytics for FY 2020–21 were reviewed.
Routine Verification Only
Tax authorities stated that some mismatches between employee-declared rent and landlord disclosures were flagged. These were handled through routine notices or verification—not through mass assessments.
Recent updates to ITR forms (especially for AY 2025–26) reflect tighter compliance and more granular data entry.
For those opting for the old regime, claiming HRA now involves:
Mentioning actual HRA received
Rent paid per month
Address of rented property
PAN of landlord (if rent > ₹1 lakh annually)
Metro vs Non-Metro selection (affects 40% or 50% limit)
These measures are aimed at preventing false or inflated HRA claims.
Tax professionals recently flagged a glitch in the ITR utility: it prompts taxpayers for “place of work” instead of “place of residence” to determine whether metro city rules apply. This could lead to under- or over-reporting of exemption values. Until corrected, it’s advised to calculate HRA manually and cross-check.
Let’s break down the pros and cons for a salaried employee:
| Criteria | Old Tax Regime | New Tax Regime |
|---|---|---|
| HRA Exemption | ✅ Allowed | ❌ Not Allowed |
| Standard Deduction | ₹50,000 | ✅ Allowed from FY 2023–24 |
| Other Deductions (80C, 80D etc.) | ✅ Allowed | ❌ Not Allowed |
| Tax Slabs | Higher | Lower |
| Ideal for | Those with rent, investments, deductions | Those with few deductions |
However, if you don’t pay rent or don’t invest much, the new regime could be simpler and more beneficial.
From a payroll perspective, employers continue to structure salaries with an HRA component—even under the new regime. This is because:
The structure remains the same regardless of regime choice
It allows flexibility to employees who may switch between regimes annually
Salary slips will show HRA, but it is not exempt if the employee opts for the new regime
Employers also report employee regime choices through Form 12BA and annual declarations.
CBDT’s recent actions reflect a larger shift toward data-driven compliance and voluntary transparency. The tax department is leveraging:
Form 26AS
Annual Information Statement (AIS)
PAN-linked databases to verify rent paid vs rent received
However, the board reiterated that this is not meant to harass honest taxpayers, but rather to curb misuse of exemptions.
Verify your regime selection every year before filing ITR.
If under the old regime, keep proof of rent payment – rent agreement, rent receipts, landlord PAN (if applicable).
Use HRA calculators or consult a tax advisor to determine whether to switch regimes.
If under new regime, don’t mistakenly claim HRA – it may trigger a mismatch notice.
File accurate metro/non-metro status manually if ITR utility glitches persist.
Due to changes in disclosure requirements and technical glitches, the ITR filing deadline for AY 2025–26 was extended to September 15, 2025. This gives salaried taxpayers extra time to:
Gather documents
Make informed regime choices
Avoid compliance errors
The CBDT’s clarification on HRA under the new tax regime provides much-needed relief and clarity to taxpayers. While HRA exemption is not available under the new regime, there is no retrospective scrutiny or mass investigation planned.
Taxpayers must now focus on making informed regime selections, accurate disclosures, and document preservation—particularly if they opt for the old regime.
As tax policies continue evolving toward simplification and digitization, awareness and proactive compliance remain your best tools for a stress-free tax season.
If you’re an individual unsure how these changes affect your ITR or need guidance on compliance, filings or need any advisory feel free to reach out to TAXAJ.