Foreign multinationals operating through Indian subsidiaries often face a crucial decision—whether to retain profits within India or repatriate them to the parent company abroad. The choice to retain earnings within Indian subsidiaries has deep tax consequences that vary across income types, business structures, and applicable treaties.
This article explores:
Direct and indirect tax consequences of retaining foreign profits
Regulatory compliance, including transfer pricing and anti-avoidance rules
The interplay of repatriation options and withholding taxes
Strategic planning using DTAAs, MAT optimization, and corporate structuring
A foreign subsidiary, once incorporated under Indian law or effectively managed from India, becomes a resident taxpayer. This implies that the subsidiary’s global income may be subject to Indian tax laws.
The standard tax rate for a foreign subsidiary is around 35%, including surcharge and health & education cess.
Reduced rates are available under special provisions like Section 115BAA (22% for domestic companies) and Section 115BAB (15% for new manufacturing companies).
Additional surcharge applies based on the income slab:
Nil up to ₹1 crore
7% up to ₹10 crore
12% beyond ₹10 crore
Even when profits are reduced due to exemptions or deductions, the MAT ensures a minimum tax of 15% on book profits.
MAT does not apply to companies opting for special concessional tax rates under Section 115BAA or 115BAB.
Retained profits, recorded as book reserves, increase book profits—and thus MAT liability—if not offset by eligible expenses.
All transactions between the Indian subsidiary and its foreign parent must comply with transfer pricing regulations:
The pricing must reflect what independent parties would agree to in similar conditions.
Requires maintaining documentation, benchmarking studies, and filing Form 3CEB annually.
Non-compliance may lead to heavy penalties, including adjustments and interest charges.
India follows the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) framework:
The General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) allows authorities to disregard transactions that lack commercial substance and are aimed solely at tax benefits.
Excessive debt, artificial royalty structures, or passive asset holding could fall under scrutiny.
While India doesn’t yet have formal Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules, the GAAR provisions fill the gap in many cases.
Retained earnings refer to profits not distributed as dividends but instead reinvested or kept in reserves:
These show up under “Reserves & Surplus” in the balance sheet.
Retained profits can fund future investments, reduce external borrowing, or serve as buffers.
However, they also increase taxable book profits, thereby impacting MAT calculations.
On eventual distribution—whether through dividends or capital restructuring—additional taxes may apply.
There are several ways for a foreign parent to receive profits from its Indian subsidiary:
India abolished the Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT), so dividends are now taxable in the hands of shareholders.
Indian companies must deduct Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) at 20%, though this may be reduced under applicable tax treaties.
The dividends are freely repatriable subject to compliance with the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA).
A share buyback by an unlisted Indian subsidiary is taxed at a flat 20% (buyback distribution tax).
For listed companies, capital gains tax may apply in the hands of shareholders instead.
Share buybacks offer a mechanism for capital restructuring without formally declaring dividends.
Payments made by Indian subsidiaries to their foreign parents for royalties, interest, or technical services are subject to withholding tax:
Standard rate: 20% (excluding surcharge and cess)
Treaty benefits may reduce the effective rate to 10–15%
The foreign recipient must provide a Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) and fill out Form 10F
If the foreign entity has a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, the income may be taxed at regular CIT rates instead
These payments are also subject to transfer pricing scrutiny, and the transaction must meet the arm’s-length test.
India has signed DTAAs with more than 90 countries. These treaties:
Prevent double taxation of the same income in both countries
Allow for reduced tax rates on dividends, interest, royalties, and fees for technical services
Clarify Permanent Establishment (PE) rules and residency definitions
Require documentation like TRC, Form 10F, and declarations of beneficial ownership
For example, under many DTAAs:
Dividends: taxed at 5–15%
Interest and Royalties: taxed at 10–15%
Technical Services: typically capped at 10–20%
Foreign subsidiaries in India must comply with several tax and regulatory filings:
Annual filing of Form 3CEB for international and specified domestic transactions
Benchmarking analysis and related party disclosures
Documentation must be retained for 8 years and furnished upon request
Companies must pay taxes in quarterly installments:
15% by June 15
45% by September 15
75% by December 15
100% by March 15
Non-compliance invites interest penalties under Sections 234B and 234C
Indian residents or shareholders must disclose foreign income/assets in tax returns
Non-disclosure of foreign assets may lead to penalties under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) Act, 2015
Any profit repatriation must comply with the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)
Requires filing with RBI, maintaining documentation, and ensuring sectoral caps are not breached
Deferral of tax: Distributing profits triggers immediate withholding taxes; retention delays this liability
Reinvestment: Profits can fund expansion, R&D, or working capital needs locally
FEMA simplicity: Avoids immediate FEMA repatriation procedures
Treaty planning: Time distributions to align with treaty eligibility or revised agreements
MAT exposure: Book profits increase due to retained earnings, potentially triggering MAT
GAAR scrutiny: If profits are retained solely to avoid tax, the arrangement may be challenged
Reduced liquidity: Parent company has less access to funds for global operations
Dividend eventuality: When eventually distributed, the tax burden may still apply, sometimes at higher future rates
Indian subsidiary retains profits for 3 years
When distributed, the dividend attracts 15% TDS under the India–US DTAA
Retention allowed reinvestment, but increased MAT in two financial years
An Indian subsidiary pays recurring royalty to its foreign parent
Royalty payments attract 10% TDS under the India–Singapore DTAA
Transfer pricing documentation supports the pricing
Profits retained in India fund new product lines
Unlisted subsidiary opts for buyback instead of dividend
Buyback tax at 20% is levied on the distributed amount
No TDS or personal income tax applies to the shareholder
Suitable for capital reduction without triggering personal tax
When deciding whether to retain or distribute profits, consider the following:
Current and future tax rates: MAT vs withholding tax
DTAA availability: Whether tax treaty benefits apply
Liquidity needs: Whether funds are required by the parent
GAAR risk: Does the transaction have real commercial intent?
Regulatory landscape: Likelihood of rate changes or law amendments
Section 115BAA: Available to domestic companies that forgo certain deductions and exemptions. Taxed at a reduced rate of 22% (plus surcharge and cess). Retaining profits under this regime can minimize overall tax impact.
Section 115BAB: Offers a 15% tax rate for new manufacturing companies set up and registered on or after October 1, 2019. This makes retention more attractive due to lower effective tax cost.
IFSC Units: Companies registered in International Financial Services Centres enjoy preferential tax regimes. MAT is at 9%, and several exemptions apply to foreign-sourced income.
Use of intercompany loans or preference shares instead of direct equity infusions can help structure capital flows efficiently.
Hybrid instruments like convertible debentures can delay repatriation while maintaining tax efficiency—though transfer pricing compliance remains critical.
Instead of using accumulated cash for dividends, the subsidiary can raise debt, pay out dividends, and repay the debt gradually.
This strategy offers flexibility while potentially lowering the effective cost of capital for the group.
Section 94B restricts interest deductions when a foreign-controlled company pays interest exceeding ₹1 crore to its non-resident associated enterprise.
Structuring the debt-equity ratio in a compliant manner helps retain capital efficiency while maximizing tax-deductible expenses.
Retaining foreign profits without a strategic tax and compliance framework can lead to several regulatory pitfalls:
Penalties for failing to maintain documentation: up to 2% of the value of each international transaction.
Incorrect pricing adjustments can lead to double taxation, where the foreign jurisdiction may not grant relief.
If retention is structured solely for tax avoidance, Indian tax authorities may apply General Anti-Avoidance Rules to disregard the transaction.
GAAR can lead to denial of treaty benefits, tax recharacterization, and penalties.
Even if profits are not distributed, retained earnings inflate book profits, which can trigger Minimum Alternate Tax if not carefully planned.
Inadequate estimation of tax liability (especially due to MAT) can result in interest penalties under Sections 234B and 234C.
Non-disclosure of overseas income or assets—including dividends or capital gains—may invite a penalty of ₹10 lakh per instance.
To avoid adverse tax consequences and optimize group cash flows, foreign companies with Indian subsidiaries should adopt a structured approach:
Prepare benchmarking reports, intercompany agreements, and justification for pricing.
Review all international transactions annually before tax filing.
Consider exchange rate trends, parent company tax year, and fiscal year alignment before repatriating profits.
Time distributions to benefit from new or revised DTAAs or upcoming changes to Indian tax rates.
Factor in book profits, MAT, and expected repatriation to correctly estimate advance tax liabilities.
Pay quarterly installments to avoid interest costs.
Every cross-border transaction should have a commercial rationale beyond tax optimization.
Avoid artificial arrangements, round-tripping, and profit parking schemes.
Indian tax law evolves rapidly—particularly in areas like MAT, transfer pricing, and treaty interpretation.
Assign in-house or external professionals to monitor changes and recalibrate strategies accordingly.
Retaining profits in the Indian subsidiary can be a smart move if:
The company is reinvesting locally
It is under a low-tax regime like 115BAA/BAB
Treaty relief can be availed upon eventual repatriation
Parent companies do not need immediate liquidity
Repatriation, on the other hand, makes sense when:
The parent requires funds for global operations
Treaty benefits allow low withholding tax
Long-term retention might increase MAT exposure
You want to avoid GAAR-related uncertainties
Ultimately, the decision should be based on a cost-benefit analysis factoring in:
Effective tax rates (CIT, MAT, TDS)
Foreign exchange considerations
Regulatory complexity
Long-term capital planning
Retaining foreign profits in Indian subsidiaries is not just a business strategy—it is a tax decision with long-term implications. While it offers advantages like reinvestment, deferral of tax, and compliance simplicity under FEMA, it also invites MAT exposure, transfer pricing scrutiny, and possibly anti-avoidance action if not properly justified.
Successful tax planning involves:
Evaluating domestic vs international tax liabilities
Leveraging DTAA benefits effectively
Ensuring robust documentation
Remaining compliant with all disclosures and regulatory filings
With India’s evolving tax landscape, it’s imperative for multinational enterprises to reassess their profit retention policies regularly, weigh the benefits of local reinvestment against the global liquidity needs, and make informed choices backed by data, compliance, and foresight.