Introduction

When a closely held company issues shares at a premium, Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act becomes a critical compliance provision. The section aims to prevent companies from issuing shares at unjustified premiums and thereby introducing unaccounted funds into the business.

Under this provision, if the issue price of shares exceeds their Fair Market Value (FMV), the excess amount may be taxable in the hands of the issuing company as "Income from Other Sources."

To justify the issue price, companies must obtain a valuation certificate. However, many founders and finance professionals often face a common question:

Should the valuation certificate be obtained from a Merchant Banker or a Chartered Accountant?

This article explains both routes, their applicability, advantages, and practical considerations.

Understanding Section 56(2)(viib)

Section 56(2)(viib) applies when:

• A closely held company issues shares.
• Shares are issued to resident investors.
• Issue price exceeds face value.
• Issue price is higher than the FMV determined under prescribed rules.

The excess amount over FMV may be treated as taxable income unless covered by specific exemptions such as eligible DPIIT-recognized startups.

Methods for Determining FMV

Rule 11UA prescribes valuation methodologies for determining FMV of unquoted equity shares.

The commonly used methods are:

1. Net Asset Value (NAV) Method

Under this approach, FMV is determined based on:

• Book value of assets
• Liabilities of the company
• Net worth position

This method is generally suitable for asset-heavy businesses.

2. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Method

DCF estimates future cash flows and discounts them to present value.

It is commonly used by:

• Startups
• Technology companies
• High-growth ventures
• Venture-funded businesses

DCF often results in a higher valuation than NAV because it considers future growth potential.

Merchant Banker vs CA Route

A. Chartered Accountant Route

Historically, Chartered Accountants were authorized to issue valuation reports under various valuation provisions.

For valuation under Rule 11UA:

Typically Used For

• NAV-based valuation
• Compliance-oriented valuations
• Small and medium enterprises

Advantages

• Lower professional fees
• Faster turnaround time
• Easier documentation process
• Suitable for straightforward valuations

Limitations

• DCF valuation acceptance is restricted under Rule 11UA.
• Investors and tax authorities often prefer merchant banker-certified DCF reports in funding transactions.

B. Merchant Banker Route

A Merchant Banker registered with SEBI can issue valuation reports under prescribed valuation regulations.

Typically Used For

• DCF valuation
• Startup funding rounds
• Angel investments
• Venture capital transactions
• Series A and subsequent fundraising rounds

Advantages

• Higher credibility among investors
• Stronger support during tax scrutiny
• Industry-standard approach for startups
• Preferred for future-oriented valuations

Limitations

• Higher professional fees
• More extensive documentation requirements
• Longer engagement process

Key Differences

Particulars	Chartered Accountant	Merchant Banker
Typical Method	NAV	DCF
Cost	Lower	Higher
Startup Funding Suitability	Moderate	High
Investor Preference	Moderate	High
Documentation	Limited	Extensive
Regulatory Acceptance for DCF	Limited	Strong
Scrutiny Defense	Moderate	Strong

Which Route Should Startups Choose?

Choose CA Valuation When:

• Business is asset-based.
• Valuation is based on NAV.
• Share premium is relatively modest.
• Compliance requirements are straightforward.
• Cost efficiency is a priority.

Choose Merchant Banker Valuation When:

• Startup is raising external funding.
• Valuation is based on future projections.
• DCF method is preferred.
• Investors require an independent valuation.
• Significant share premium is involved.

Documentation Required for Valuation

Companies generally need:

• Certificate of Incorporation
• Memorandum and Articles of Association
• Latest financial statements
• Cap table/shareholding pattern
• Projected financial statements
• Business plan
• Details of proposed investment
• Previous funding documents (if any)

Common Mistakes to Avoid

1. Preparing unrealistic financial projections.
2. Obtaining valuation after share allotment.
3. Using unsupported assumptions in DCF models.
4. Ignoring Rule 11UA requirements.
5. Failing to maintain supporting documentation.
6. Not reconciling valuation with investor agreements.

Impact of DPIIT Startup Recognition

Eligible DPIIT-recognized startups may claim exemption from the applicability of Section 56(2)(viib), subject to prescribed conditions.

However, maintaining proper valuation documentation remains advisable for governance, investor due diligence, and future tax assessments.

Conclusion

Choosing between a Merchant Banker and Chartered Accountant valuation depends on the nature of the transaction, valuation methodology, investor expectations, and compliance requirements.

For traditional businesses or NAV-based valuations, a CA-issued report may be sufficient and cost-effective. However, for startups raising capital at significant premiums based on future growth potential, a Merchant Banker-certified DCF valuation generally offers stronger credibility and regulatory support.

A well-documented valuation report not only helps comply with Section 56(2)(viib) but also strengthens investor confidence and minimizes future tax litigation risks.

👉 Explore more informational content on our YouTube Channel:
🔗 https://www.youtube.com/@taxajca